Certified Solvency ii Training for the countries of the EEA
Certified Solvency ii Training for countries outside the EEA
Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
Solvency and Financial Condition Report
 
 
Member Benefits                                               ►  Certified Solvency ii Training
   ► How to Become a Member                                ► Order Your Certificate Of Membership  
Reading Room                                                   ► Contact Us
 
   
 
The Solvency ii Directive
 
SUBSECTION 6 – SUPERVISION OF GROUP SOLVENCY FOR GROUPS WITH CENTRALISED RISK MANAGEMENT

Article 234
Subsidiaries of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking: conditions


Member States shall provide that the rules laid down in Articles 236 and 238 shall apply to any insurance or reinsurance undertaking which is the subsidiary of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking where all of the following conditions are satisfied:

(a) the subsidiary, in relation to which the group supervisor has not made any decision under Article 212(2), is included in the group supervision carried out by the group supervisor at the level of the parent undertaking in accordance with this Title;

(b) the risk management processes and internal control mechanisms of the parent undertaking cover the subsidiary and the parent undertaking satisfies the supervisory authorities concerned regarding the prudent management of the subsidiary;

(ba) the parent undertaking has received the agreement referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 250(4);

(bb) the parent undertaking has received the agreement referred to in Article 260(2);

(c) ---

(d) an application for permission to be subject to Articles 236 and 238 has been submitted by the parent undertaking and a favourable decision has been made on such application in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 235.

Article 235
Subsidiaries of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking: decision on the application


1. In the case of applications for permission to be subject to the rules laid down in Articles 236 and 238, the supervisory authorities concerned shall work together within the college of supervisors, in full consultation, to decide whether or not to grant the permission sought and to determine the other terms and conditions, if any, to which such permission should be subject.

An application as referred to in the first subparagraph shall be submitted only to the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary. The supervisor shall inform and forward the complete application to the other supervisory authorities within the college without delay.

2. The supervisory authorities concerned shall do everything within their power to reach a joint decision on the application within three months from the date of receipt of the complete application by all supervisory authorities within the college.

3. During the period referred to in paragraph 2, in the case of diverging views concerning the approval of the application referred to in paragraph 1, the group supervisor or any of the other supervisory authorities concerned may consult the CEIOPS. Where the CEIOPS is consulted, all supervisory authorities concerned should be informed and the period referred to in paragraph 2 shall be extended by one month.

Where the CEIOPS has been consulted, the supervisory authorities concerned shall duly consider such advice before taking their joint decision.

3a. The supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary shall provide to the applicant the joint decision referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 in a document containing the fully reasoned decision and an explanation of any significant deviation from the positions adopted by the CEIOPS, where it has been consulted. The joint decision shall be recognised as determinative and applied by the supervisory authorities in the Member States concerned.

3b. In the absence of a joint decision between the supervisory authorities concerned within the periods set out in paragraphs 2 and 3, the group supervisor shall make its own decision on the application.

In making its decision, the group supervisor shall duly consider the following:

(a) any views and reservations of the supervisory authorities concerned expressed during the applicable period;

(b) any reservations of the other supervisory authorities within the college expressed during the applicable period;

(c) where the CEIOPS has been consulted, its advice.

The decision shall be set out in a document containing the fully reasoned decision and an explanation of any significant deviation from the reservations of the other supervisory authorities concerned and the advice of the CEIOPS. The decision shall be provided to the applicant and the other supervisory authorities concerned by the group supervisor.


Article 236
Subsidiaries of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking: determination of the Solvency Capital Requirement



1. Without prejudice to Article 229, the Solvency Capital Requirement of the subsidiary shall be calculated as set out in paragraphs 2, 3a, and 4.

2. Where the Solvency Capital Requirement of the subsidiary is calculated on the basis of an internal model approved at group level in accordance with Article 229 and the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary considers that its risk profile deviates significantly from this internal model, and as long as that undertaking does not properly address the concerns of the supervisory authority, that authority may, in the cases referred to in Article 37, propose to set a capital add-on to the Solvency Capital Requirement of that subsidiary resulting from the application of such model, or, in exceptional circumstances where such capital add-on would not be appropriate, to require that undertaking to calculate its Solvency Capital Requirement on the basis of the standard formula. The supervisory authority shall discuss its proposal within the college of supervisors and communicate the grounds for such proposals to both the subsidiary and the college of supervisors.

3. Where the Solvency Capital Requirement of the subsidiary is calculated on the basis of the standard formula and the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary considers that its risk profile deviates significantly from the assumptions underlying the standard formula, and as long as that undertaking does not properly address the concerns of the supervisory authority, that authority may, in exceptional circumstances, propose to require the undertaking to replace a subset of the parameters used in the standard formula calculation by parameters specific to those undertakings when calculating the life, non-life and health underwriting risk modules, as set out in Article 108a, or in the cases referred to in Article 37, to set a capital add-on to the Solvency Capital Requirement of that subsidiary.

The supervisory authority shall discuss its proposal within the college of supervisors and communicate the grounds for such proposal to both the subsidiary and the college of supervisors.

3a. The college of supervisors shall do everything within its power to reach an agreement on the proposal of the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary and/or on other possible measures.

4. Where the supervisory authority and the group supervisor disagree within one month from the proposal of the supervisory authority, the matter shall be referred for consultation to the CEIOPS, which shall give its advice within two months.

The supervisory authority having authorised that subsidiary shall duly consider such advice before taking its final decision.

The decision shall be set out in a document containing the fully reasoned decision and shall take into account the views and reservations of the other supervisory authorities within the college and the advice from the CEIOPS.

The decision shall be submitted to the subsidiary and to the college of supervisors.


Article 237 ---

Article 238
Subsidiaries of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking: non-compliance with the Solvency Capital Requirement


1. Without prejudice to Article 136, the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary shall – in case of non-compliance with Solvency Capital Requirement – forward without delay to the college of supervisors the recovery plan submitted by the subsidiary in order to achieve, within six months from the observation of the non-compliance with the Solvency Capital Requirement, the reestablishment of the level of eligible own funds or the reduction of its risk profile to ensure compliance with the Solvency Capital Requirement.

The college of supervisors shall do everything within its power to reach an agreement on the proposal of the supervisory authority regarding the approval of the recovery plan within four months from the date of the observation of the non-compliance with the Solvency Capital Requirement.

In the absence of an agreement, the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary makes its own decision on the approval of the recovery plan, taking duly into account the views and reservations of the other supervisory authorities within the college.

1a. When the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary identifies, in accordance with article 134, deteriorating financial conditions it shall notify without delay the college of supervisors.
 
With the exception of in emergency situations, the measures to be taken should be discussed under the college of supervisors.

The college of supervisors shall do everything within its power to reach an agreement on the proposal of the supervisory authority regarding the measures to be taken within one month from the date of the communication.

In the absence of an agreement, the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary makes its own decision, taking duly into account the views and reservations of the other supervisory authorities within the college.

1b. Without prejudice of Article 137, the supervisory authority having authorised the subsidiary shall – in case of non-compliance with Minimum Capital Requirement – forward without delay to the college of supervisors the short-term finance scheme submitted by the subsidiary in order to achieve, within three months from the observation of the non-compliance with the Minimum Capital Requirement, the reestablishment of the level of eligible own funds covering the Minimum Capital Requirement or the reduction of its risk profile to ensure compliance with the Minimum Capital Requirement. The college of supervisors should also be informed of any measures taken to enforce the Minimum Capital Requirement at the level of the subsidiary.


Article 239
Article 240
Article 241

Article 242

Subsidiaries of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking: end of derogations for a subsidiary


1. The rules provided for in Articles 236 and 238 shall cease to apply in the following cases:

(a) the condition referred to in Article 234(a) is no longer complied with;

(b) the condition referred to in Article 234(b) is no longer complied with and the group does not restore compliance with this condition in an appropriate period of time;

(ba) the conditions referred to in Article 234(ba) and (bb) are no longer complied with.

In the case referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, where the group supervisor decides, after consultation with the college of supervisors, no longer to include the subsidiary in the group supervision it carries out, it shall immediately inform the supervisory authority concerned and the parent undertaking.

For the purposes of Article 234(b), ba) and (bb), the parent undertaking shall be responsible for ensuring that the conditions are complied with on an on-going basis.
 
In the event of non-compliance, it shall inform the group supervisor and the supervisor of the subsidiary concerned without delay. The parent undertaking shall present a plan to restore compliance within an appropriate period of time.

Without prejudice to the third subparagraph, the group supervisor shall verify at least once a year, on its own initiative, that the conditions referred to in Article 234(b), ba) and (bb) continue to be complied with. The group supervisor shall also perform such verification upon request from the supervisory authority concerned, where the latter has significant concerns related to the ongoing compliance with this condition.

Where the verification performed identifies weaknesses, the group supervisor shall require the parent undertaking to present a plan to restore compliance within an appropriate period of time.

If, after consulting the college of supervisors, the group supervisor determines that the plan referred to in the third or fourth subparagraph is insufficient or subsequently that it is not being implemented within the agreed period of time, the group supervisor shall conclude that the condition referred to in Article 234(b), (ba) and (bb) is no longer complied with and it shall immediately inform the supervisory authority concerned.

2. The regime provided for in Articles 236 and 238 shall be again applicable if the parent undertaking submits a new application and obtains a favourable decision in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 235.

 
Article 243
Article 244

Article 245

Subsidiaries of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking: implementing measures


In order to ensure the uniform application of Articles 234, 235, 236, 238 and 242, the Commission shall adopt implementing measures relating to the following:

(a) specifying the criteria to be applied when assessing whether the conditions stated in Article 234 are satisfied;

(aa) specifying the criteria to be applied when assessing what should be considered emergency situations as stated in Article 238;

(b) (c) ---

(d) specifying the procedures to be followed by supervisory authorities when exchanging information, exercising their rights and fulfilling their duties in accordance with Articles 235, 236, 238 and 242.

Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).


Article 246

Review clause


1. Two years after the date referred to in Article 310, the Commission shall make an assessment of the application of Title III of this Directive, in particular of the cooperation of supervisory authorities within, and functionality of, the colleges, as referred to in Article 252, of the legal status of the CEIOPS, and of the supervisory practices on setting the capital add-ons, and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied where appropriate by proposals for its review.

2. Three years after the date referred to in Article 310, the Commission shall make an assessment of the benefit of enhancing group supervision and capital management within a group of insurance or reinsurance undertakings including a reference to COM(2008)0119 and the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament on this proposal of 16 October 2008 (A6-0413/2008). The assessment should include possible measures to enhance a sound cross-border management of insurance groups notably of risks and asset management. In its assessment, the Commission shall, inter alia, take into account new developments and progress concerning:

(a) harmonised framework on early intervention;

(b) practices in centralised group risk management, functioning of group internal models, including stress testing;

(c) intra-group transactions and risk concentrations;

(d) the behaviour of diversification and concentration effects over time;

(e) legally binding framework for the mediation of supervisory disputes;

(f) a harmonised framework on asset transferability, insolvency and winding up procedures which eliminates the relevant national company or corporate law barriers to asset transferability;

(g) equivalent level of protection of policyholders and beneficiaries of the undertakings of the same group particularly in crisis situations;

(h) a harmonised and adequately funded EU-wide solution for insurance guarantee schemes;

(i) a harmonised and legally binding framework between competent authorities, central banks and ministries of finance concerning crisis management, resolution and fiscal burden-sharing which aligns supervisory powers with fiscal responsibilities.

The Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, accompanied where appropriate by proposals for its review.


Article 247
Subsidiaries of an insurance holding company


Articles 234, 235, 236, 238, 242, 245 and 246 shall apply mutatis mutandis to insurance and reinsurance undertakings which are the subsidiary of an insurance holding company.



SECTION 2 - RISK CONCENTRATION AND INTRA-GROUP TRANSACTIONS

Article 248
Supervision of risk concentration


1. Supervision of the risk concentration at group level shall be exercised in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, Article 250 and Chapter III.

2. The Member States shall require insurance and reinsurance undertakings or insurance holding companies to report on a regular basis and at least annually to the group supervisor any significant risk concentration at the level of the group.

The necessary information shall be submitted to the group supervisor by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking which is at the head of the group or, where the group is not headed by a insurance or reinsurance undertaking, by the insurance holding company or by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking in the group identified by the group supervisor after consultation with the other supervisory authorities concerned and with the group.

The risk concentrations shall be subject to supervisory review by the group supervisor.

3. The group supervisor, after consultation with the other supervisory authorities concerned and the group, shall identify the type of risks insurance and reinsurance undertakings in a particular group shall report in all circumstances.

When defining or giving their opinion about the type of risks, the group supervisor and the other supervisory authorities concerned shall take into account the specific group and risk management structure of the group.

In order to identify significant risk concentration to be reported, the group supervisor, after consultation of the other supervisory authorities concerned and the group, shall impose appropriate thresholds based on solvency capital or technical provisions or both.

When reviewing the risk concentrations, the group supervisor shall in particular monitor the possible risk of contagion in the group, the risk of a conflict of interests, and the level or volume of risks.

4. The Commission may adopt implementing measures, as regards the definition and identification of a significant risk concentration and the reporting on such a risk concentration, for the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3.

Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).


Article 249
Supervision of intra group transactions


1. Supervision of intra group transactions shall be exercised in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, Article 250 and Chapter III.

2. The Member States shall require insurance and reinsurance undertakings or insurance holding companies to report on a regular basis and at least annually to the group supervisor all significant intra-group transactions by insurance and reinsurance undertakings within a group, including those performed with any natural person linked to any undertaking within the group by close links.

In addition, Member States shall require reporting of very significant intra-group transactions as soon as is practicable.

The necessary information shall be submitted to the group supervisor by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking which is at the head of the group or, where the group is not headed by an insurance or reinsurance undertaking, by the insurance holding company or by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking in the group identified by the group supervisor after consultation with the other supervisory authorities concerned and with the group.

The intra-group transactions shall be subject to supervisory review by the group supervisor.

3. The group supervisor, after consultation with the other supervisory authorities concerned and the group, shall identify the type of intra-group transactions insurance and reinsurance undertakings in a particular group must report in all circumstances. Article 248(3) shall apply by analogy.

4. The Commission may adopt implementing measures, as regards the definition and identification of a significant intra-group transaction and the reporting on such an intra-group transaction, for the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3.

Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).


SECTION 3 - RISK MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROL

Article 250
Supervision of the system of governance


1. The requirements set out in TITLE I, Chapter IV, Section 2 shall apply mutatis mutandis at the level of the group.

Without prejudice to the first subparagraph, the risk management and internal control systems and reporting procedures shall be implemented consistently in all the undertakings included in the scope of group supervision pursuant to points (a) and (b) of Article 211(2) so that those systems and reporting procedures can be controlled at the level of the group.

2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, the group internal control mechanisms shall include at least the following:

(a) adequate mechanisms as regards group solvency to identify and measure all material risks incurred and to appropriately relate eligible own funds to risks;

(b) sound reporting and accounting procedures to monitor and manage the intra-group transactions and the risk concentration.

3. The systems and reporting procedures referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 shall be subject to supervisory review by the group supervisor, in accordance with the rules laid down in Chapter III.

4. Member States shall require the participating insurance or reinsurance undertaking or the insurance holding company to undertake at the level of the group the assessment required by Article 44. The own risk and solvency assessment conducted at group level shall be subject to supervisory review by the group supervisor in accordance with Chapter III.

Where the calculation of the solvency at the level of the group is carried out in accordance with the accounting consolidation-based method referred to in Article 228, the participating insurance or reinsurance undertaking or the insurance holding company shall provide to the group supervisor a proper understanding of the difference between the sum of the Solvency Capital Requirements of all the related insurance or reinsurance undertakings of the group and the group consolidated Solvency Capital Requirement.

Where the participating insurance or reinsurance undertaking or the insurance holding company so decides, and subject to the agreement of the group supervisor, it may undertake any assessments required by Article 44 at the level of the group and at the level of any subsidiary in the group at the same time, and may produce a single document covering all the assessments.

Before granting the agreement in accordance with the third subparagraph, the group supervisor shall consult and duly take into account any views and reservations of the members of the college of supervisors referred to in Article 252.

Where the group exercises the option provided in the third subparagraph, it shall submit the document to all supervisory authorities concerned at the same time. Exercising this option shall not remove from the subsidiaries concerned the obligation to ensure that the requirements of Article 44 are met.


CHAPTER III

MEASURES TO FACILITATE GROUP SUPERVISION

Article 251
Group Supervisor


1. A single supervisor, responsible for coordination and exercise of group supervision, shall be designated from among the supervisory authorities of the Member States concerned (hereinafter "group supervisor").

2. Where the same supervisory authority is competent for all insurance and reinsurance undertakings in a group, the task of group supervisor shall be exercised by that supervisory authority.

In all other cases and subject to paragraph 3, the task of group supervisor shall be exercised by the following:

(a) where a group is headed by an insurance or reinsurance undertaking, by the supervisory authority which has authorised that undertaking;

(b) where a group is not headed by an insurance or reinsurance undertaking, by the supervisory authority identified in accordance with the following:

(i) where the parent of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking is an insurance holding company, by the supervisory authority which has authorised that insurance or reinsurance undertaking;

(ii) where more than one insurance or reinsurance undertaking with a head office in the Community have as their parent the same insurance holding company, and one of these undertakings has been authorised in the Member State in which the insurance holding company has its head office, by the supervisory authority of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking authorised in that Member State;

(iii) where the group is headed by more than one insurance holding company with a head office in different Member States and there is an insurance or reinsurance undertaking in each of these States, by the supervisory authority of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking with the largest balance sheet total;

(iv) where more than one insurance or reinsurance undertaking with a head office in the Community have as their parent the same insurance holding company and none of these undertakings has been authorised in the Member State in which the insurance holding company has its head office, by the supervisory authority which authorised the insurance or reinsurance undertaking with the largest balance sheet total;

(v) where the group is a group without a parent undertaking, or in any other case, by the supervisory authority which authorised the insurance or reinsurance undertaking with the largest balance sheet total.

3. In particular cases, the supervisory authorities concerned may, at the request of any of the authorities, take a joint decision to derogate from the criteria set out in paragraph 2 if their application would be inappropriate, taking into account the structure of the group and the relative importance of the insurance and reinsurance undertakings activities in different countries, and designate a different supervisory authority as group supervisor.

For that purpose, any of the supervisory authorities concerned may request that a discussion be opened on whether the criteria referred to in paragraph 2 are appropriate. Such a discussion shall not take place more than once a year.

The supervisory authorities concerned shall do everything within their power to reach a joint decision on the choice of the group supervisor within three months from the request for discussion. Before taking their decision, the supervisory authorities concerned shall give the group an opportunity to state its opinion.

3a. During the period referred to in paragraph 3, any of the supervisory authorities concerned may request that the CEIOPS be consulted. In the event that the CEIOPS is consulted, the period referred to in paragraph 3 shall be extended by two months.

3b. In the event that the CEIOPS is consulted, the supervisory authorities concerned shall duly take into account the CEIOPS' advice before taking their joint decision. The joint decision shall be fully reasoned and shall contain an explanation of any significant deviation from the positions adopted by the CEIOPS.

4. In the absence of a joint decision derogating from the criteria set out in paragraph 2, the task of group supervisor shall be exercised by the supervisory authority identified in accordance with paragraph 2.

5. The CEIOPS shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, at least once a year, of any major difficulties with the application of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.

In the event that any major difficulties arise from the application of the criteria set out in paragraphs 2 and 3, the Commission shall adopt implementing measures specifying these criteria.

Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).

6. Where a Member State has more than one supervisory authority for the prudential supervision of insurance and reinsurance undertakings, such Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure coordination between those authorities.


Article 252
Rights and duties of the group supervisor and the other supervisors – College of supervisors


1. The rights and duties assigned to the group supervisor with regard to group supervision shall comprise the following:

(a) coordination of the gathering and dissemination of relevant or essential information for going concern and emergency situations, including the dissemination of information which is of importance for the supervisory task of a supervisory authority;

(b) supervisory review and assessment of the financial situation of the group;

(c) assessment of compliance of the group with the rules on solvency and of risk concentration and intra-group transactions as set out in Articles 216 to 249;

(d) assessment of the system of governance of the group, as set out in Article 250, and of whether the members of the administrative or management body of the participating undertaking meet the requirements set out in Article 42 and Article 261;

(e) planning and coordination, through regular meetings held at least annually or other appropriate means, of supervisory activities in going concern as well as in emergency situations, in cooperation with the supervisory authorities concerned and taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in the business of all undertakings that are part of the group;

(f) other tasks, measures and decisions assigned to the group supervisor by this Directive or deriving from the application of this Directive, in particular leading the process for validation of any internal model at group level as set out in Articles 229 and 231 and leading the process for permitting the application of the regime established in articles 235, 236, 238 and 242.

2. In order to facilitate group supervision, a college of supervisors, chaired by the group supervisor, shall be established to facilitate the exercise of the tasks referred to in paragraph 1.

The college of supervisors shall ensure that cooperation, exchange of information and consultation processes among the supervisory authorities of the college, are effectively applied in accordance with Title III of this Directive, with a view to promoting the convergence of their respective decisions and activities.

2a. The membership of the college shall include the group supervisor and supervisory authorities of all the Member States in which the head office of all subsidiary undertakings is situated.

The supervisory authorities of significant branches and related undertakings shall also be allowed to participate in the colleges of supervisors. However, their participation shall only be limited to achieving the objective of efficient exchange of information.

The effective functioning of the college may require that some activities be carried out by a reduced number of supervisory authorities within the college.

2b. Without prejudice to any measure adopted pursuant to this Directive, the establishment and functioning of colleges shall be based on coordination arrangements concluded by the group supervisor and the other supervisory authorities concerned.

In the case of diverging views concerning the coordination arrangements, any member of the college may refer the matter to the CEIOPS.

The group supervisor, following the consultation with the supervisory authorities concerned, shall duly consider any advice produced within two months by the CEIOPS before taking its final decision. The decision shall be set out in a document containing the fully reasoned decision and an explanation of any significant deviation from any advice given by the CEIOPS. The group supervisor shall transmit the decision to the other supervisory authorities concerned.

2c. Without prejudice to any measure adopted pursuant to this Directive, the coordination arrangements shall specify the procedures for:

(a) the decision-making process among the supervisory authorities concerned as referred to in Articles 229, 230 and 251;

(b) the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 and in Article 216(5).

Without prejudice to the rights and duties allocated by this directive to the group supervisor and to other supervisory authorities, the coordination arrangements may entrust additional tasks to the group supervisor or the other supervisory authorities in the cases where this results in a more efficient supervision of the group and does not impair the supervisory activities of the members of the college in respect of their individual responsibilities.

In addition, the coordination arrangements may specify:

(a) the consultation among the supervisory authorities concerned, in particular as referred to in Articles 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 219, 225, 248, 249, 250, 254, 260, 263 and 264;

(b) the cooperation with other supervisory authorities.

2d. The CEIOPS shall elaborate guidelines for the operational functioning of colleges on the basis of comprehensive reviews of the work of the colleges to assess the level of convergence between them. Such reviews shall be performed at least every three years. Member states shall ensure that the group supervisor transmit to the CEIOPS the information on the functioning of the college and any difficulties encountered relevant for the reviews.

3. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures for the coordination of group supervision for the purposes of paragraphs 1 to 2d, including the definition of a significant branch.

Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).


Article 253
Cooperation and exchange of information between supervisory authorities


1. The authorities responsible for the supervision of the individual insurance and reinsurance undertakings in a group and the group supervisor shall cooperate closely, in particular in cases where an insurance or reinsurance undertaking encounters financial difficulties.

With the objective of ensuring that the supervisory authorities, including the group supervisor, have the same amount of relevant information available to them, without prejudice to their respective responsibilities, and whether or not established in the same Member State, they shall provide one another with such information in order to allow and facilitate the exercise of the supervisory tasks of the other authorities under this Directive.
 
In this regard, the supervisory authorities concerned and the group supervisor shall communicate without delay to one another all relevant information as soon as it becomes available.
 
The information referred to in this subparagraph includes, but is not limited to, information about actions of the group and supervisors, and information provided by the group.

1a. The authorities responsible for the supervision of the individual insurance and reinsurance undertakings in a group and the group supervisor shall each call immediately for a meeting of all supervisors involved in group supervision in at least the following cases:

(a) when they become aware of a significant breach of the Solvency Capital Requirement or a breach of the Minimum Capital Requirement of an individual insurance or reinsurance undertaking; or

(b) when they become aware of a significant breach of the Solvency Capital Requirement at group level calculated on the basis of consolidated data or the aggregated group Solvency Capital Requirement, in accordance with which method according to Title III, Chapter II, Section 1, Subsection 4, is used;

(c) when other exceptional circumstances occur or have occurred.

2. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures determining the items which are, on a systematic basis, to be gathered by the group supervisor and disseminated to other supervisory authorities concerned or to be transmitted to the group supervisor by the other supervisory authorities concerned.

The Commission shall adopt implementing measures specifying the items essential or relevant for supervision at group level with a view to enhancing convergence of supervisory reporting.

The measures referred to in the first and second subparagraphs designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).


Article 254
Consultation between supervisory authorities


1. Without prejudice to Article 252, the supervisory authorities concerned shall, where a decision is of importance for the supervisory tasks of other supervisory authorities, prior to that decision, consult each other in the college of supervisors with regard to the following items:

(a) changes in the shareholder structure, organisational or management structure of insurance and reinsurance undertakings in a group, which require the approval or authorisation of supervisory authorities;

(b) major sanctions or exceptional measures taken by supervisory authorities, including the imposition of a capital add-on to the Solvency Capital Requirement under Article 37 and the imposition of any limitation on the use of an internal model for the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement under Title I, Chapter VI, Section 4, Subsection 3.

For the purposes of point (b), the group supervisor shall always be consulted.

In addition, the supervisory authorities concerned shall, where a decision is based on information received from other supervisory authorities, consult each other prior to that decision.

2. Without prejudice to Article 252, a supervisory authority may decide not to consult in cases of urgency or where such consultation may jeopardise the effectiveness of the decision. In that case, the supervisory authority shall, without delay, inform the other supervisory authorities concerned.


Article 255
Requests from the group supervisor to other supervisory authorities


The group supervisor may invite the supervisory authorities of the Member State in which a parent undertaking has its head office, and which do not themselves exercise the group supervision pursuant to Article 251, to request from the parent undertaking any information which would be relevant for the exercise of its coordination rights and duties as laid down in Article 252, and to transmit that information to the group supervisor.

The group supervisor shall, when it needs information referred to in Article 258(2) which has already been given to another supervisory authority, contact that authority whenever possible in order to prevent duplication of reporting to the various authorities involved in supervision.


Article 256
Cooperation with authorities responsible for credit institutions and investment firms


Where an insurance or reinsurance undertaking and either a credit institution as defined in Directive 2006/48/EC or an investment firm as defined in Directive 2004/39/EC, or both, are directly or indirectly related or have a common participating undertaking, the supervisory authorities concerned and the authorities responsible for the supervision of those other undertakings shall cooperate closely.

Without prejudice to their respective responsibilities, those authorities shall provide one another with any information likely to simplify their task, in particular as set out in this Title.


Article 257
Professional secrecy and confidentiality


Member States shall authorise the exchange of the information between their supervisory authorities and between their supervisory authorities and other authorities, as referred to in Articles 253 to 256.

Information received in the framework of group supervision, and in particular any exchange of information between supervisory authorities and between supervisory authorities and other authorities which is provided for in this Title, shall be subject to the provisions on professional secrecy and communication of confidential information laid down in Article 297.


Article 258
Access to information


1. Member States shall ensure that the natural and legal persons included within the scope of group supervision, and their related undertakings and participating undertakings, are able to exchange any information which could be relevant for the purposes of group supervision.

2. Member States shall provide that their authorities responsible for exercising group supervision shall have access to any information relevant for the purposes of that supervision regardless of the nature of the undertaking concerned. Article 35 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

The supervisory authorities concerned may only address themselves directly to the undertakings in the group to obtain the necessary information, if such information has been requested from the insurance undertaking or reinsurance undertaking subject to group supervision and has not been supplied by it within a reasonable period of time.


Article 259
Verification of information


1. Member States shall ensure that their supervisory authorities may carry out within their territory, either directly or through the intermediary of persons whom they appoint for that purpose, on-site verification of the information referred to in Article 258 on the premises of any of the following:

(a) the insurance or reinsurance undertaking subject to group supervision;

(b) related undertakings of that insurance or reinsurance undertaking;

(c) parent undertakings of that insurance or reinsurance undertaking;

(d) related undertakings of a parent undertaking of that insurance or reinsurance undertaking.

2. Where supervisory authorities wish in specific cases to verify the information concerning an undertaking, whether or not regulated, which is part of a group and is situated in another Member State, they shall ask the supervisory authorities of that other Member State to have the verification carried out.

The authorities which receive such a request shall, within the framework of their competences, act upon that request either by carrying out the verification directly, by allowing an auditor or expert to carry it out, or by allowing the authority which made the request to carry it out itself. The group supervisor shall be informed of the action taken.

The supervisory authority which made the request may, if it so wishes, participate in the verification when it does not carry out the verification directly.


Article 260
Group solvency and financial condition report


1. Member States shall require participating insurance and reinsurance undertakings or insurance holding companies to publicly disclose, on an annual basis, a report on the solvency and financial condition at the level of the group.
 
Articles 50 and 52 to 54 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

2. Where a participating insurance or reinsurance undertaking or an insurance holding company so decides, and subject to the agreement of the group supervisor, it may provide a single solvency and financial condition report which shall comprise the following:

(a) the information at the level of the group which must be disclosed in accordance with paragraph 1;

(b) the information for any of the subsidiaries within the group which must be individually identifiable and disclosed in accordance with Articles 50 and 52 to 54.

Before granting the agreement in accordance with the first subparagraph, the group supervisor shall consult and duly take into account any views and reservations of the members of the college of supervisors referred to in Article 252.

3. Where the report referred to in paragraph 2 fails to include information which the supervisory authority having authorised a subsidiary within the group requires comparable undertakings to provide, and where the omission is material, the supervisory authority concerned shall have the power to require the subsidiary concerned to disclose the necessary additional information.

3a. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures further specifying the information which must be disclosed and the means by which this is to be achieved as regards the single solvency and financial condition report.

Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).


Article 261
Administrative or management body of insurance holding companies


Member States shall require that all persons who effectively run the insurance holding company are fit and proper to perform their duties.

The provisions set out in Article 42 shall apply by analogy.


Article 262
Enforcement measures


1. If the insurance or reinsurance undertakings in a group do not comply with the requirements referred to in Articles 216 to 250 or where the requirements are met but solvency may nevertheless be jeopardised or where the intra-group transactions or the risk concentrations are a threat to the financial position of the insurance or reinsurance undertakings, the following shall require the necessary measures in order to rectify the situation as soon as possible:

(a) the group supervisor with respect to the insurance holding company;

(b) the supervisory authorities with respect to the insurance and reinsurance undertakings.

Where, in the case referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, the group supervisor is not one of the supervisory authorities of the Member State in which the insurance holding company has its head office, the group supervisor shall inform those supervisory authorities of its findings with a view to enabling them to take the necessary measures.

Where, in the case referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph, the group supervisor is not one of the supervisory authorities of the Member State in which the insurance or reinsurance undertaking has its head office, the group supervisor shall inform those supervisory authorities of its findings with a view to enabling them to take the necessary measures.

Without prejudice to paragraph 2, Member States shall determine the measures which may be taken by their supervisory authorities with respect to insurance holding companies.

The supervisory authorities concerned, including the group supervisor, shall where appropriate coordinate their enforcement measures.

2. Without prejudice to their criminal law provisions, Member States shall ensure that sanctions or measures may be imposed on insurance holding companies which infringe laws, regulations or administrative provisions enacted to implement this Title, or on the person effectively managing those companies.
 
The supervisory authorities shall cooperate closely to ensure that such sanctions or measures are effective, especially when the central administration or main establishment of an insurance holding company is not located at its head office.

3. The Commission may adopt implementing measures for the coordination of enforcement measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.

Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 304(3).


Article 262a
Reporting of the CEIOPS


1. The CEIOPS shall annually attend the European Parliament for a general parliamentary committee hearing. When due, the hearing may also include the reporting for the purpose of Article 70, paragraph 2.

2. In doing so, the CEIOPS shall among others report on all relevant and important experiences of the supervisory activities and cooperation between supervisors in the framework of Title III, in particular on:

(a) the process of the nomination of the group supervisor, the number of group supervisors and geographical spread;

(b) the working of the colleges of supervisors, in particular the involvement and commitment of supervisory authorities where they are not the group supervisor.

3. The CEIOPS may for the purposes of paragraph 1 also include, when available, the main lessons drawn from the reviews referred to in Article 252(2d).
 
 
   
 
Return to Index
 
Solvency ii Introduction (1) to (10)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (11) to (20)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (21) to (30)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (31) to (40)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (41) to (50)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (51) to (60)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (61) to (70)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (71) to (80)
 
Solvency ii Introduction (81) to (95)
 
Solvency ii Articles 1 to 10
 
Solvency ii Articles 11 to 20
 
Solvency ii Articles 21 to 30
 
Solvency ii Articles 31 to 39
 
Solvency ii Articles 40 to 49
 
Solvency ii Articles 50 to 62
 
Solvency ii Articles 63 to 71
 
Solvency ii Articles 72 to 85
 
Solvency ii Articles 86 to 99
 
Solvency ii Articles 100 to 125
 
Solvency ii Articles 126 to 142
 
Solvency ii Articles 143 to 159
 
Solvency ii Articles 160 to 173
 
Solvency ii Articles 174 to 203
 
Solvency ii Articles 204 to 215
 
Solvency ii Articles 216 to 233
 
Solvency ii Articles 234 to 262
 
Solvency ii Articles 263 to 298
 
Solvency ii Articles 300 to 313
 
Solvency ii ANNEX 1 to 3
 
Solvency ii ANNEX 4 to 5